In This Article
Before accepting a nonprofit brownfield property, organize the site evidence, funding questions and community priorities your board needs to decide next steps.
Last updated
Nonprofit Brownfield Property: A Board Decision Brief
A nonprofit brownfield property decision should begin with the proposed community use and the evidence needed to judge it. Before accepting a donated or discounted site, ask the board to distinguish two decisions: whether to investigate the opportunity and whether to acquire the property.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's guidance for nonprofits involved in brownfield reuse recommends due diligence before buying or acquiring a property. It also points nonprofits toward their state environmental agency and an environmental professional for help with assessment, cleanup and reuse.
A board needs a way to bring that advice into a decision alongside its mission, finances and operating capacity. The packet below is our recommended planning tool. It is not an EPA checklist, a site assessment or legal advice. Have qualified environmental and legal advisers review the property and transaction before making an acquisition commitment.
What should a nonprofit brownfield property brief ask the board to decide?
Put the requested decision at the top of the paper. If staff need permission to commission advice, say what work they propose, who would perform it and what spending authority they need. Do not describe an investigation request as approval of the eventual reuse.
Then explain the community need without relying on the availability of this particular site. Who would benefit? What problem would the proposed use address? Could the nonprofit meet that need through another property, an existing partner or a smaller project?
Keep declining the property among the options. A donor's interest in transferring land and a nonprofit's interest in delivering a program are different questions. Our community-led planning and strategy work starts with people and place. For this decision, that means testing the proposed use against community priorities before treating the offered property as the answer.
Write down what would change the recommendation. An unresolved technical issue may require more investigation; an unfunded operating responsibility may require a different delivery partner. Give the board an explicit next decision rather than a general invitation to support an appealing idea.
What do you need to know about the site?
Ask for a property file that identifies the parcel, proposed use, available records and gaps in the investigation. Keep the owner's description separate from findings supplied by qualified advisers. Mark information as unverified when nobody has checked it.
EPA's nonprofit guidance describes the initial investigation as a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, or ESA. Depending on past land uses, further testing may be necessary through a Phase II ESA. The board should ask the environmental professional what the available assessment does and does not establish for this property.
Ask the professional to explain the scope, remaining questions and implications for the intended use in language the board can discuss. Request the underlying report as well as the summary.
Keep assumptions about use visible. A proposal for public recreation and a proposal for another use should not quietly share the same conclusion about suitability. Ask the technical advisers whether a change in the proposed use changes the investigation or controls they recommend. Avoid announcing a safe opening date before those questions are resolved.
Does a Phase I assessment settle liability?
Do not treat completion of a report as a guarantee. EPA defines All Appropriate Inquiries, or AAI, as the process of evaluating a property's environmental conditions and assessing potential liability for contamination. Its guidance connects AAI to specific statutory liability protections, with requirements that need to be evaluated for the transaction.
EPA's separate bona fide prospective purchaser guidance is explicit: a party seeking that status must meet threshold criteria, including AAI before acquisition, and continuing obligations. Those obligations include appropriate care with respect to hazardous substances through reasonable steps to address continuing or threatened releases.
Ask counsel and the environmental professional to identify which requirements they are assessing, what must happen before acquisition and what responsibilities could continue afterward. Have them distinguish federal questions from other applicable requirements. This brief cannot determine whether a particular nonprofit or transaction qualifies for protection.
Bring the response back to the board as named tasks with owners. If an adviser identifies a continuing responsibility, ask who would carry it out, where the records would live and how the nonprofit would pay for it. An unanswered responsibility belongs in the decision paper, not in a footnote staff hope to resolve later.
Can the nonprofit afford to investigate, acquire and operate the property?
Build a budget around the proposed work rather than the acquisition price alone. Ask the finance lead to separate investigation and transaction costs from any site work, program setup and ongoing operation. Obtain technical cost inputs from the people qualified to provide them; leave an unknown amount visibly unknown.
For each funding source, record whether it is committed, conditional, under discussion or merely a prospect. Show any restrictions and the decision or document needed to resolve them. Ask what happens if a hoped-for contribution arrives late or does not arrive at all.
EPA identifies several resources available to nonprofits, including brownfields grants and Targeted Brownfields Assessments. That is a reason to investigate assistance, not evidence that this organization, site or proposed expenditure has secured funding. Ask the relevant program contact about current eligibility, timing and requirements before building those resources into an approved plan.
Our financial modeling and philanthropic strategy capabilities can support the planning side of this work: organizing assumptions, comparing options and clarifying the funding questions decision-makers need answered. Keep that work connected to the technical scope. A neat financial model cannot resolve an unknown site condition.
If the opportunity survives initial review, the guide to turning a nonprofit strategic plan into fundable projects covers the broader work of defining scope, implementation responsibilities and a funding case. For the property decision, first ask whether the nonprofit has a credible way to pay for its next commitment.
What can community members still influence?
Before inviting participation, state which choices remain open. Can people influence the proposed use, access arrangements, program priorities or the decision to proceed? Which questions require technical investigation rather than a community vote?
EPA's nonprofit guidance emphasizes understanding community needs from the start. Our participatory process design and engagement work provides a way to organize those conversations without asking residents to validate a finished proposal.
Use the nonprofit stakeholder engagement guide to plan who should participate and how. For this project, document who has been heard, whose perspective is missing and who will respond to questions. Explain uncertainty plainly. A possible reuse is still a proposal when assessment, funding or operating arrangements remain unresolved.
Return a record of the input to the board. Include disagreements and the reasons for proposed responses, rather than reporting attendance as community approval. If the nonprofit cannot accommodate a request, explain why and identify whether another option remains open. These are recommended engagement practices, not findings about a particular neighborhood.
How do you assemble the board decision packet?
Use the following sections as an evidence-request list. For each section, record the evidence available, its source and date, the accountable owner, the unresolved issue and the decision affected. Copy these fields into a working table, with one row for each section below.
- Purpose and alternatives. Describe the community need, proposed use and alternatives, including not acquiring the site. Identify who has informed the proposal and what could change it.
- Property evidence. Identify the property and relevant records. Ask the environmental professional to explain the assessment scope, findings and remaining investigation.
- Legal and environmental responsibilities. Request qualified advice on pre-acquisition requirements and continuing responsibilities. Assign owners to the resulting tasks.
- Funding and capacity. Separate cost estimates from unknowns, committed funding from prospects, and project delivery from ongoing operation. Name the source of each assumption.
- Community participation. Record the choices still open, who can influence them and how the nonprofit will respond. Keep unresolved concerns visible.
- Stewardship and next decision. Identify the proposed operator and responsibility for records, monitoring and other commitments identified by advisers. State the decision requested now and the evidence needed for a later acquisition decision.
We recommend ending with one of three next steps: investigate further within a defined scope, defer until named evidence is available, or decline the opportunity. These are planning categories, not legal approval language. Use the organization's own governance process for any formal action.
Avoid averaging the packet into a single attractiveness score. Ask the board to confront any unresolved issue that could make the proposed commitment unsuitable, even when the other sections look promising. Record why the next step is proportionate to what is known.
For help coordinating the planning, engagement and funding questions, bring the proposed reuse, available property information and unresolved decisions to a Council Fire planning conversation. We can discuss that scope alongside the work of your environmental and legal advisers.
Frequently asked questions
01Does a donated property still need due diligence?
Treat the proposed gift as a property decision requiring qualified advice, rather than assuming a zero purchase price settles the risks. EPA's nonprofit guidance recommends diligence before buying or acquiring property. Ask advisers to assess the actual transfer and intended use.
02Does a Phase I assessment guarantee liability protection?
No stand-alone guarantee follows from completing a Phase I. EPA's bona fide prospective purchaser guidance describes threshold criteria and continuing obligations. Have qualified advisers determine what applies; a board worksheet cannot establish protected status.
03Can community planning start before all site questions are answered?
We recommend discussing needs and possible uses while clearly identifying unresolved technical questions. EPA encourages understanding community needs from the start. Do not promise a particular use, safe access or an opening date that the available evidence does not support.
04Should the nonprofit apply for funding before acquiring the property?
There is no universal sequence established by this brief. EPA lists resources that may support nonprofit brownfield reuse, but the organization must check the relevant program's current requirements and discuss the transaction with its advisers. Keep funding applications and acquisition approval as separate decisions.
Related Resources
- Checklist for Building Nonprofit-Business Partnerships helps frame the relationship with a donor or delivery partner and the responsibilities to put in writing.
- How to Design a Stakeholder Engagement Strategy That Builds Trust for NGOs & Nonprofits covers participation planning for the people affected by a proposed reuse.
- How to Turn a Strategic Plan into Fundable, Shovel-Ready Projects for NGOs & Nonprofits addresses the broader scope, budget and governance work needed to develop a project.
- Building Successful Community-Corporate Sustainability Partnerships explores how different partners contribute to a shared project.
Additional Resources
- EPA: Nonprofit Involvement in Brownfields Reuse outlines due diligence, community planning and possible assistance for nonprofits.
- EPA: Brownfields All Appropriate Inquiries explains the environmental inquiry process and its relationship to potential liability protections.
- EPA: Bona Fide Prospective Purchasers describes threshold criteria and continuing obligations to discuss with qualified advisers.
About the Author
Jeff Lue is Council Fire's Finance & Operations Manager. His public profile describes a focus on operations, budgets and process design. Explore Council Fire's sustainable communities services for community planning and engagement support.
FAQ