Circular business models focus on reducing waste and improving resource efficiency through recycling, reusing, and refurbishing. While effective in minimizing harm, they don't actively improve ecosystems or communities. Regenerative business models, however, aim to restore and improve natural systems and societal well-being. They prioritize long-term ecosystem health, biodiversity, and community resilience over short-term efficiency gains.

Key Differences:

• Goals: Circular models reduce harm; regenerative models restore and improve.

• Value Creation: Circular models save costs through efficiency; regenerative models invest in long-term ecosystem and social health.

• Metrics: Circular models use efficiency-based indicators like waste reduction; regenerative models measure system health, such as soil quality and biodiversity.

To transition, businesses should assess their impact, redefine success metrics to include environmental and social outcomes, and implement restorative practices like regenerative sourcing and community collaboration. This shift positions businesses as contributors to thriving ecosystems and societies.

How regenerative business models are redefining innovation and sustainability - Francesco Derchi

Key Differences Between Circular and Regenerative Models

When comparing circular and regenerative business models, their distinct goals, methods of creating value, and measures of success become clear. While both represent a step forward from traditional linear practices, they are built on different philosophies and aim for unique outcomes. Understanding these differences helps illuminate the strategies each model employs.

Goals and Focus

Circular models emphasize resource efficiency and waste reduction, aiming to keep materials in use for as long as possible. By closing loops within current systems, these models focus on recycling, remanufacturing, and extending product lifecycles to minimize waste and maximize material utility.

Regenerative models, on the other hand, go beyond efficiency to actively improve natural and social systems. Their goals include restoring soil health, increasing biodiversity, fostering community resilience, and creating conditions where ecosystems and societies can flourish.

The scope of their impact also sets them apart. Circular models primarily address environmental concerns within specific industries or supply chains, working to reduce harm. Regenerative models adopt a broader perspective, seeking to enhance the overall health of interconnected ecological and social networks.

Value Creation Approach

The way these models create value reveals a fundamental difference in their approach. Circular models work within existing systems, improving sustainability by optimizing resource use and minimizing waste.

Regenerative models challenge the status quo, positioning businesses as active contributors to system health. Instead of merely reducing harm, they generate value by restoring ecosystems, strengthening community ties, and building resilience. This often requires businesses to rethink their processes and collaborate with local communities and environmental groups.

The timelines for realizing value also differ. Circular models often yield immediate benefits, such as cost savings from reduced material use and waste disposal. Regenerative models, however, require patience, as activities like ecosystem restoration and community development take time to produce measurable results.

Metrics for Success

The metrics used to measure success further highlight the differences between these models. Circular models rely on efficiency-based metrics, such as material recovery rates, energy savings, waste diversion percentages, and cost reductions. These metrics are often straightforward and focus on quantifiable improvements.

Regenerative models, in contrast, use health-based indicators that assess the vitality of systems over time. Examples include soil carbon sequestration, biodiversity levels, water quality, economic resilience in communities, and measures of social equity. Success is determined by whether ecosystems and societies are becoming stronger and more self-sustaining.

The table below summarizes the key contrasts between the two approaches:

Circular models often rely on straightforward calculations - such as the amount of waste diverted or energy conserved - to demonstrate success. Regenerative models, however, require more complex and nuanced monitoring. For example, they might track changes in soil microbiomes, measure the strength of community networks, or assess the resilience of ecosystems over decades.

While both models offer valuable tools for reducing environmental harm, regenerative approaches represent a deeper shift. They challenge businesses to see themselves not just as efficient users of resources but as integral players in creating thriving, interconnected systems.

Core Principles of Regenerative Business Models

Regenerative business models are built on three key principles that set them apart from conventional approaches. These principles aim to guide businesses toward creating a positive impact while fostering resilient and thriving systems. Instead of merely reducing harm, these models encourage companies to take active steps to restore and renew both natural and social systems.

Systems Thinking

At the heart of systems thinking is the understanding that businesses are deeply connected to ecological and social networks. Operations don’t exist in isolation; instead, every decision has a ripple effect, influencing everything from environmental health to community well-being.

For instance, a manufacturing company might not only optimize its production processes but also consider how its operations affect local water supplies, air quality, worker health, and the economic stability of nearby communities. By mapping out all stakeholders affected by their actions - ranging from suppliers to future generations - businesses can better understand their broader impact and adjust strategies to align with long-term sustainability goals.

This approach encourages organizations to establish mechanisms for monitoring these wider effects, ensuring that they remain accountable and responsive. A holistic perspective like this fosters meaningful collaboration with communities and other stakeholders.

Community Engagement

In regenerative models, community engagement goes far beyond the traditional idea of corporate social responsibility. It’s about forming genuine partnerships with local communities and co-creating value together. Rather than treating communities as external stakeholders, businesses view them as integral collaborators.

This often begins with listening - understanding the needs, values, and strengths of a community before designing initiatives. Inclusive planning and shared ownership models are central to this process, helping to build local capacity and resilience. For example, businesses can invest in education, skill development, or infrastructure projects that directly benefit the community while aligning with the company’s goals.

By involving communities in decision-making and sharing economic benefits equitably, businesses not only strengthen relationships but also contribute to the long-term stability of the regions they operate in.

Restorative Practices

Restorative practices lie at the core of regenerative business models. These actions aim to repair and improve the health of natural and social systems, addressing what has been degraded or depleted.

In supply chains, restorative practices often include regenerative sourcing. This involves prioritizing suppliers who use methods that enhance soil health, boost biodiversity, and capture carbon - such as those in regenerative agriculture or sustainable forestry. For example, farmers adopting regenerative agricultural methods can improve soil carbon levels, water retention, and ecosystem diversity.

In the energy sector, companies might invest in distributed energy systems like solar panels that not only power their operations but also benefit surrounding communities. Ecosystem restoration is another focus, with businesses funding projects like reforestation, wetland rehabilitation, or habitat creation. These efforts aim to leave ecosystems healthier than before, achieving net-positive outcomes.

Water stewardship provides another concrete example. Companies can implement measures to reduce water use while improving water quality in their watersheds. Constructing wetlands, for instance, can naturally treat wastewater while creating habitats for local wildlife.

Restorative efforts extend beyond the environment to social systems as well. Businesses can invest in local education, support community-owned enterprises, and create job opportunities to help rebuild and sustain the social fabric of the communities they serve. These actions not only strengthen the community but also create a foundation for long-term mutual success.

Strategies for Transitioning to Regenerative Models

Shifting from circular to regenerative business models calls for a deliberate and structured approach, one that goes beyond minor adjustments. Companies must adopt specific strategies to evaluate their current impact, reimagine their operations, and track progress toward regenerative goals. This transition requires addressing several interconnected areas that collectively drive meaningful change.

Evaluating Impact on Business and Society

The journey toward regeneration starts with a comprehensive assessment of a company's environmental, social, and economic footprint. This type of analysis lays the groundwork for transformation, identifying harmful practices and revealing untapped opportunities. A thorough footprint analysis should consider the effects on ecosystems, community well-being, and economic resilience.

Organizations like Council Fire specialize in conducting these in-depth impact assessments, helping companies pinpoint areas where regenerative practices can deliver the greatest benefits. Unlike traditional environmental audits, this process dives deeper into social dynamics, community relationships, and economic flows. It highlights opportunities to shift from extractive methods to restorative ones - all while maintaining financial viability. Additionally, gap analyses are performed to identify areas for improvement, often uncovering significant potential in aspects like employee well-being and local economic growth.

Once a detailed baseline is established, the next critical step is to reimagine performance metrics to align with regenerative outcomes.

Redefining Metrics for Regeneration

To truly embrace regeneration, companies must expand their definition of success to include environmental and social outcomes alongside financial performance [1]. One effective approach is adopting the Regenerative North Star Metric, which integrates social, environmental, and financial impacts into a single, guiding measurement [2]. Transparent and robust systems for tracking and reporting progress are essential for maintaining accountability and building trust with stakeholders [3].

These systems often feature dashboards that monitor key indicators such as carbon sequestration, biodiversity restoration, community economic growth, and ecosystem vitality. A well-rounded measurement framework combines quantitative data with qualitative insights, offering a holistic view of regenerative progress. Transparency plays a crucial role here - companies need to set clear goals, openly share their environmental and social performance, and provide regular updates on their achievements [1].

Tools and Frameworks for Regenerative Transformation

Bringing regenerative business models to life requires more than just good intentions - it demands practical tools and frameworks that guide decisions and track progress. These methodologies translate strategies into actionable steps, helping organizations achieve measurable outcomes. While the field of regenerative business continues to grow, several established approaches can be tailored to support this transformation. Additionally, specialized consulting services offer crucial guidance for navigating this shift.

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Tools

Life Cycle Assessment tools are essential for understanding the environmental impact of products and services, covering everything from raw material extraction to disposal. While traditional LCA focuses on reducing harm, regenerative models aim for something more ambitious: creating positive impacts on ecosystems and communities.

The shift requires asking straightforward but powerful questions, as regenerative business advocate Paul Hawken explains:

"It is about using common-sense and bringing decision-making back to simple, binary questions such as 'Does it restore land or degrade it? Does it promote fundamental human rights or deny them?'" [4]

To adapt LCA tools for regenerative purposes, companies often expand their metrics to include factors like soil health, carbon sequestration, water quality, and local economic benefits. This broader approach typically involves collaboration with ecologists, social scientists, and local communities to ensure a well-rounded perspective.

In addition to these analytical tools, consulting services play a vital role in accelerating the transition to regenerative practices.

Council Fire's Consulting Services

Council Fire specializes in helping organizations balance financial goals with environmental and social impacts, ensuring that regenerative efforts remain economically practical. Their approach emphasizes collaboration with stakeholders and strategic planning to align regenerative initiatives with both business priorities and community needs.

Their services span areas like natural resource management, energy and water infrastructure improvements, and sustainable community development. By focusing on interconnected systems, they help organizations create ripple effects that generate benefits across multiple areas.

B Impact Assessment

The B Impact Assessment provides a robust framework for evaluating and improving a company’s impact across five key areas: Governance, Workers, Community, Environment, and Customers. Originally designed for B Corporation certification, this tool has become invaluable for organizations pursuing regenerative goals.

Unlike traditional assessments that focus solely on efficiency, the B Impact Assessment evaluates how businesses contribute positively to ecosystems and communities. It integrates social, environmental, and economic metrics, offering a comprehensive view of performance. Its benchmarking features allow companies to compare their progress with industry peers and identify areas for growth.

Many organizations discover unexpected connections through this framework, such as how improving worker well-being can enhance environmental performance or how community engagement can spark innovation in sustainable product design. The transparency built into the assessment further supports regenerative principles by encouraging open dialogue about successes and areas needing improvement.

Conclusion: From Circularity to Regeneration

Shifting from circular to regenerative business models represents a profound change in how companies approach value creation. Circular models aim to minimize harm by focusing on waste reduction and efficient resource use. Regenerative models, however, go further by actively working to restore and improve the systems they interact with, generating lasting positive impacts.

Adopting regenerative principles offers organizations advantages that extend well beyond cost savings. These include fostering stronger connections with communities, bolstering supply chain stability, and positioning themselves as forward-thinking leaders in an economy that prioritizes restoration over extraction. By integrating systems thinking, collaborating with communities, and using restorative strategies, businesses lay the groundwork for sustainable success that aligns profitability with environmental and social progress.

To begin this transformation, companies can focus on three critical steps:

• Performing a thorough impact assessment to uncover opportunities for restoration

• Collaborating with local communities and ecosystems to develop shared solutions

• Implementing tracking systems to measure environmental and social outcomes alongside financial performance

This transition isn’t just about adopting new methods - it’s about embracing a mindset that prioritizes positive change. By embedding regenerative practices into their operations, businesses can become catalysts for improving both natural systems and societal well-being.

FAQs

What are the key first steps for a business to shift from a circular to a regenerative model?

To start shifting from a circular to a regenerative business model, companies need to rethink their objectives, moving beyond merely minimizing waste to actively restoring and improving ecosystems. This transformation means weaving regenerative principles into every layer of operations and supply chains.

Here are some essential first steps:

• Evaluate existing practices: Pinpoint areas where environmental, social, and economic benefits can be restored or strengthened.

• Engage with stakeholders: Work closely with suppliers, customers, and local communities to ensure efforts align with regenerative goals.

• Prioritize innovation: Support advancements that boost ecosystem health, like renewable energy, regenerative farming methods, or sourcing sustainable materials.

By embracing these approaches, businesses can contribute positively to the environment while building enduring value for the future.

How do regenerative business models define success differently from circular models?

Regenerative business models aim to achieve a net-positive impact, actively working to restore natural ecosystems while improving community well-being. On the other hand, circular models focus on minimizing waste and reducing harm to the environment.

Circular approaches prioritize sustainability by emphasizing reuse, recycling, and efficient resource management. Regenerative models, however, take it a step further. They strive to not only reduce damage but also enhance the environments and societies they engage with. Their success is defined by creating measurable environmental, social, and economic improvements.

Why is community engagement essential for regenerative business models?

Community engagement lies at the heart of regenerative business models, serving as a vital link between collaboration, trust, and meaningful action. By emphasizing fair labor practices, boosting local economies, and actively involving stakeholders in decision-making, businesses can help build communities that are not only stronger but also more resilient.

When businesses engage directly with their communities, they ensure their regenerative initiatives address real needs and deliver tangible benefits. This alignment between business objectives and community priorities creates a ripple effect, driving sustained progress while contributing to social and economic well-being for all parties involved.

Related Blog Posts

• Beyond the Badge: What It Really Takes to Be a Purpose-Driven Brand in 2025