Cities face a $360 billion annual shortfall in funding needed to prepare for climate challenges. While climate disasters cost U.S. cities $1.6 trillion in the last few decades, only 1% of global urban climate finance goes toward adaptation. Smaller cities and developing regions face even greater struggles due to limited resources and credit access.

Key Takeaways:

• Funding Gap: $360 billion/year needed globally for resilience projects.

• Disproportionate Impacts: Smaller cities and low-income regions are hit hardest.

• Barriers: Short-term political priorities, lack of credit, and complex funding processes.

• Solutions: Green bonds, public-private partnerships, and blended finance show promise.

Quick Overview of Solutions:

• Green Bonds: Cities like Toronto raised nearly $1 billion for climate projects.

• Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs): Coventry, UK, modernized its energy infrastructure with private sector help.

• Blended Finance: Cape Town combined public and private funds to secure $360 million for resilience efforts.

Cities must improve financial skills, create investment-ready projects, and build partnerships to close the gap and secure long-term funding for climate resilience.

Assessing Climate Finance Enabling Environments for Cities: Launch of New Tools

Main Barriers to Climate Funding

Cities face a tangled web of challenges when trying to secure funding for climate resilience projects. These hurdles are particularly daunting for smaller municipalities and communities with limited resources, making effective climate action an uphill battle.

Current Funding Methods Fall Short

The way funding is currently structured simply doesn’t meet the demands of long-term climate resilience. Only a small slice of the funding pie goes toward adaptation projects, revealing a disconnect between existing financial systems and what’s actually needed to build resilience.

Here’s a breakdown of the main roadblocks:

"It is painfully clear that the cost of acting on climate change is far lower than the cost of inaction. Cutting emissions and investing in climate adaptation will save lives and protect economies" [2]

While these systemic issues affect cities across the board, smaller municipalities face an even tougher set of challenges.

Small Cities Face Extra Hurdles

Smaller cities, particularly those in low- and middle-income countries, often find themselves at a disadvantage. With 58% of the urban population in these regions living in cities with fewer than 1 million residents [3], the obstacles they encounter are distinct and pressing.

Here’s a closer look at what these communities face:

• Limited Credit Access: Less than 20% of the 500 largest cities worldwide are considered creditworthy on an international scale [3], making it nearly impossible for them to secure commercial financing.

• Resource Constraints: Kristin Smith from Headwaters Economics explains the strain on these smaller governments:

  "They're experiencing floods, they're experiencing fires, and we see these events getting more and more extreme. These are also the places that tend to have really small local governments" [4]

• Project Scale Challenges: Many climate-related projects in smaller cities operate on a much smaller scale. In 2023, nearly 40% of projects reported through CDP-ICLEI Track had budgets of less than $500,000, and 74% of these came from cities with populations under 500,000 [5].

Adding to the difficulty, about 60% of federal infrastructure funding for climate resilience projects requires local governments to cover 20-30% of the project costs [4]. While this policy aims to encourage local investment, Smith highlights its unintended consequences:

"The intent was to incentivize local investments, but in practice the scoring rubric made it more difficult for smaller communities to compete" [4]

New Funding Tools and Methods

Cities are finding creative ways to tackle funding challenges, turning to financial tools that align with their long-term climate resilience goals.

Using Green Bonds

Green bonds have become a popular way for cities to fund climate-related projects. In 2023 alone, global green bond sales hit $575 billion [7], underscoring their growing role in climate finance. These bonds work like municipal bonds but are specifically earmarked for environmental projects. What sets them apart are their strict certification requirements and the need for transparent reporting.

To issue green bonds successfully, cities typically follow these steps:

Toronto provides a great example of how green bonds can work. Through its Green Debenture Program, the city has raised nearly $1 billion to support renewable energy and energy efficiency projects, all part of its plan to achieve net-zero emissions by 2040 [8].

"Green bonds raise awareness for the challenges of climate change and demonstrate the potential for institutional investors to support climate-smart investments through liquid instruments without giving up financial returns" - World Bank [7]

Private-Public Project Funding

Public-private partnerships (PPPs) allow cities to share the risks and costs of large-scale infrastructure projects while benefiting from private sector expertise. These partnerships are especially useful for projects that require significant capital.

Coventry, UK, offers a great example. The city entered into a 15-year Strategic Energy Partnership with E.ON, a collaboration that has provided long-term funding to modernize its energy infrastructure [10]. This partnership highlights how private sector involvement can accelerate climate resilience efforts.

"There are two drivers of investor demand for resilient projects: climate realities and government incentives" - Brookings [9]

Mixed Funding Approaches

Blended finance combines public, private, and philanthropic funds to create well-rounded financial solutions, especially for projects considered too risky for private investors alone.

Cape Town is a standout example of this strategy. By August 2024, the city secured funding from multiple sources:

• ZAR 3.5 billion ($200 million) from Nedbank

• €100 million from the French development agency AFD

• ZAR 2.8 billion ($160 million) from the International Finance Corporation [10]

Another success story comes from the West Midlands Combined Authority in the UK. Its Local Net Zero Accelerator program uses a mix of grants, private debt, and outcome-based financing. By leveraging energy cost savings and benefits like carbon credits, the program attracts diverse investments [12].

"Blending finance is a proven approach for optimised risk management and can help to make otherwise high-risk investments viable for private sector investors" - Cities Climate Finance Leadership Alliance [11]

This approach reduces reliance on a single funding source and maximizes available resources. With cities needing an estimated $4.5 trillion annually by 2030 for climate initiatives [12], these funding strategies offer a way to scale up resilience efforts while improving project readiness and investment appeal.

Improving City Finance Skills

Cities need to sharpen their financial expertise to fund and execute long-term climate resilience projects. Here’s how they can prepare projects, utilize data effectively, and enhance their creditworthiness to close the gap in resilience funding.

Creating Investment-Ready Projects

As of August 2024, 86% of the 2,508 climate projects reported by cities were actively seeking funding [12]. To attract investment, cities must ensure their projects are well-structured, with clear objectives, thorough feasibility studies, strong governance, and consistent monitoring [10].

Using Data to Guide Decisions

Data-driven approaches allow cities to prioritize investments and measure their impact effectively. A standout example is Portland, Oregon, which has tracked carbon emissions since 1993. Despite a 39% population rise, the city achieved a 25% reduction in emissions compared to 1990 levels [13].

"I think it's incredibly important for people everywhere to have access to good, reliable data because we need that in order to properly understand how grave and great and urgent a problem climate change is. There's a huge amount of noise out there." - Rachel Huxley, Director of Knowledge and Learning, C40 Cities [13]

Key strategies for leveraging data include:

• Installing extensive monitoring systems

• Making climate data openly accessible

• Using AI to analyze climate trends

• Comparing outcomes against defined metrics

The World Bank’s Green Economy Diagnostic (GED) prototype showcases how AI can process diverse datasets to uncover patterns in air quality and temperature fluctuations, helping cities shape effective policies [14].

Boosting City Credit Ratings

A strong credit rating is essential for securing favorable financing terms. However, fewer than 20% of the largest 500 cities in developing countries are considered creditworthy in their local context [15].

Barranquilla, Colombia, is a great example of a city improving its financial standing. Revenue efficiency measures in 2007 led to a 23.7% revenue increase by 2008. By 2017, the city earned an international investment-grade credit rating from Moody’s and secured a €120 million loan from the French development agency AFD.

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors now play a significant role in credit ratings. Between 2017 and 2018, 34% of U.S. public finance rating changes were influenced by ESG considerations [16]. To strengthen their credit ratings, cities should focus on:

• Keeping adequate reserve funds

• Practicing conservative budgeting

• Establishing clear debt management policies

• Preparing for revenue fluctuations with contingency plans

• Ensuring timely and transparent financial disclosures

Success Stories in City Climate Finance

Chicago's Green Bond Success

In December 2014, the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (MWRD) issued a $297 million green bond to support projects like streambank stabilization, phosphorus recovery facilities, and energy efficiency upgrades [17]. This marked a significant milestone, as investor participation doubled compared to a similar offering in 2011, with one-third of participants being new investors.

"We have always assessed the environmental benefits of our projects, so we thought it was a good time for us to enter the green bond market. It expanded and differentiated our bond offering and how we present it to investors." - Mary Ann Boyle, MWRD Treasurer [17]

Chicago's approach highlights how cities can effectively utilize green bonds to fund critical infrastructure projects, while also addressing environmental challenges like flooding and energy efficiency.

Copenhagen and New York City's Flood Plans

After a devastating 2011 cloudburst caused $1 billion in damages [18], Copenhagen developed innovative flood management strategies. These solutions later inspired New York City’s $400 million Cloudburst Program [18].

Key achievements of this collaboration include:

• Combining green spaces with traditional flood infrastructure

• Targeting flood-prone areas such as Corona Park and Kissena Park

• Projected savings of $290 million in avoided costs [19]

"With this initiative, New York City is taking a major step in flood-proofing the city. Copenhagen and New York have worked intensively together for the past seven years on developing this and it is fantastic to see it will now become a reality." - Lykke Leonardsen, Head of Program for Resilient and Sustainable City Solutions for the City of Copenhagen [18]

This partnership demonstrates how cities can share expertise to tackle shared challenges, creating more resilient urban environments.

Austin's Energy Grid Updates

Austin Energy has set an ambitious target: achieving 100% carbon-free energy by 2035 [20]. Through a mix of federal funding and innovative projects, the utility is making significant progress:

• Secured $887 million from federal grants and capital improvement funds

• Deployed AI-powered wildfire detection to enhance grid resilience

• Reduced over 6 million metric tons of emissions since March 2020 [21]

"It sets the course for a cleaner, more resilient energy future by balancing affordability, sustainability and reliability as we transition to 100% carbon-free energy." - Bob Kahn, Departing General Manager, Austin Energy [20]

Austin’s efforts illustrate how cities can harness climate finance to modernize infrastructure and prioritize sustainability.

These examples underscore how cities around the world are using innovative funding mechanisms and collaborations to address climate challenges effectively and drive impactful change.

Conclusion: Next Steps for Cities

Action Items for Decision Makers

To strengthen cities' financial and operational frameworks, decision makers should focus on these key areas:

These steps lay the groundwork for easier access to funding. For instance, Barranquilla's efforts in tax collection and fiscal reforms led to securing a €120 million loan, showcasing the tangible benefits of sound financial strategies [10].

Building Better Partnerships

Strategic partnerships can significantly amplify the impact of climate finance, particularly when leveraging innovative funding models. These collaborations are vital for narrowing the resilience funding gap. A standout example is Bristol's City Leap program, which, in partnership with Ameresco Ltd and Vattenfall Heat UK, is projected to deliver over £1 billion in energy investments over 20 years [23].

Here are a few partnership strategies that have shown success:

• Establish clear communication channels: Oslo's Business for Climate network acts as a hub for engaging businesses in climate action and budget discussions [23].

• Tap into local expertise: Prince George's County, Maryland, partnered with Corvias for its Clean Water initiative, achieving 40% cost savings while ensuring 50% participation from local businesses [24].

• Create innovation hubs: Medellín's Ruta N initiative attracted 471 tech companies and generated 22,500 jobs, driving both economic growth and innovation [22].

The focus should remain on developing "bankable" projects that attract private investment without compromising public benefits. Cape Town’s ability to secure ZAR 3.5 billion (roughly $200 million) in private funding underscores how a well-defined project pipeline can open doors to diverse financial resources [10].

FAQs

What challenges do cities face in securing climate resilience funding, and how can they address them?

Cities often face hurdles when trying to secure funding for climate resilience projects. Limited government resources, challenges in proving the long-term value of such investments, and disjointed budgeting processes are common roadblocks. Adding to the complexity are concerns about the risks tied to climate projects and a lack of effective collaboration among key players.

One way to overcome these challenges is by exploring alternative funding options like green bonds or forming public-private partnerships to bridge financial gaps. Building stronger connections with federal and state governments, as well as local organizations, can help uncover new funding sources. Additionally, aligning resilience efforts with existing city plans and focusing on integrated strategies can pave the way for more sustainable financing opportunities.

How can smaller U.S. cities with limited budgets use green bonds and public-private partnerships to fund climate adaptation projects?

Smaller U.S. cities often face tight budgets, but they can still tackle climate adaptation projects by leveraging green bonds and public-private partnerships (PPPs). Green bonds are a practical way to raise funds specifically for projects that focus on environmental sustainability. They offer cities affordable, long-term financing to improve infrastructure and address climate risks. For instance, a city might issue green bonds to fund flood-resistant roads or energy-efficient public buildings, which can also appeal to investors interested in socially responsible initiatives.

PPPs provide another avenue by allowing cities to team up with private companies. These partnerships help share the costs, risks, and expertise needed for large-scale projects. Through PPPs, cities can access cutting-edge solutions like nature-based infrastructure or advanced energy systems, while easing the financial strain on local governments. Together, green bonds and PPPs can be combined into a powerful strategy, enabling smaller cities to strengthen their climate resilience and safeguard their communities effectively.

How can cities improve their financial skills and credit ratings to secure long-term climate funding?

Improving financial skills and credit ratings is a critical step for cities aiming to secure funding for climate initiatives. By establishing clear metrics and ensuring transparent financial disclosures, cities can help financial markets evaluate risks more effectively. This can translate into better interest rates and improved asset valuations.

Another strategy involves leveraging creative financial tools, such as bundling bonds for resilience projects with climate-risk insurance. This method serves as a credit enhancement, making these projects more appealing to investors and boosting the chances of obtaining necessary funding. Additionally, strengthening financial management practices and working closely with financial experts are vital in crafting sustainable, long-term climate finance strategies.

Related posts

• Why Local Governments Must Lead the Climate Fight - With or Without Federal Support